Search for: "United States v. Robinson"
Results 501 - 520
of 947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
Omit the facts portion of the memo in your answer.Question 3As you know, a House of Representatives select committee charged with investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol has issued subpoenas for records and testimony from various actors, including the Archivist of the United States (as custodian of executive records), former officials in the Trump administration, and informal advisors to the President. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
The United States Supreme Court recently held in Heien v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:55 am
The Texas Supreme Court then discussed the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:12 am
United States Trustee U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
The Northern Ireland Act 1998 has therefore never really been regarded as something that can/should sustain a legally sovereign legislature, even if the Act has been described as a “constitutional statute” (see Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2002] UKHL 32). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States, the court held 5-4 that pretrial imprisonment on a new criminal charge puts a term of federal supervised release on hold. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Wouldn't it be prudent for the people of the United States to have the same prior to "hiring" someone to lead the country[?] [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
Robinson, 817 F. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
” At Bloomberg BNA, Kimberly Robinson reports on Pavan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
United States, 17-646, Tyler v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm
Disparity in Federal Sentencing: Boston Globe staff writer Jonathan Saltzman has this article on a recent study of the widened disparity in federal sentences in light of the case United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 9:32 am
The piece is headlined "3rd Circuit Upholds 10-Year Internet Ban in Child Porn Case," and here are excerpts: [T]he decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
The treatise is the standard reference in antitrust and the common-law nature of antitrust in the United States makes the treatise particularly influential. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to reimburse health insurance companies for some of the losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act, for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
By a vote of 2 to 1, the Sixth Circuit refused this week, in United States v. [read post]
