Search for: "United States v. Rodgers"
Results 1 - 20
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:
30 Sep 2010, 10:58 pm
He also gave the United States 30 days to file a surreply. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:27 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Here is an interesting case from Missouri: In Rodgers v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
” State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In Rodgers v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:09 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:18 am
From Judge Joseph Rodriguez, writing in Rodgers v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:29 am
Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
Instead, they appealed and the United States Court of Appeals reversed the district court. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:50 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:50 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am
Legal history-related panels include:ThursdayConfiguring the Cold War: Constructive Courtroom Narratives in Dennis et al v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:03 am
On February 12, 2014, the United States District Court granted the United States’ motion for summary judgment which entitled the US to foreclose upon a taxpayer’s properties for back payroll and income taxes. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Rodger alone dissented. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The agreement “stated that it was governed by Belize law.” In 2008, the United Democratic Party took power on a good government platform, and the new prime minister, Dean Barrow, asserted that the contract was invalid and repudiated it. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 4:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
