Search for: "United States v. Rodriquez"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2018, 3:47 am
” Ritchie v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:45 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
In particular, this part highlights the spoken and unspoken premises that influenced the result in Bustamonte and outlines Bustamonte's continuing relevance for consent search cases today.Part III examines United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
UNITED STATES | Questions Presented 06-1646 UNITED STATES V. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
Rodriquez (case page forthcoming). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:24 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
RODRIQUEZ, GINO G.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
By a vote of 2 to 1, the Sixth Circuit refused this week, in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:51 am
United States, 520 U.S. 651, 657, 117 S.Ct. 1573, 137 L.Ed.2d 917 (1997) (‘Ordinarily, where a specific provision conflicts with a general one, the specific governs. [read post]
2 May 2015, 12:23 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:34 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:45 am
United States, the Trump administration argues that its agents can obtain information from cell phone providers revealing where a cell phone user traveled for weeks and months at a time. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
United States, 350 F.3d 299, 306 (2d Cir. 2003); accord County of Erie, 546 F.3d at 229; see also Bilzerian, 926 F.2d at 1292; von Bulow, 828 F.2d at 103; Am. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:36 am
Manual Rodriquez ;The People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
• United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
See Rodriquez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
• United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:27 am
” United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Update: As correctly noted by Mike Sachs, Chief Justice Roberts’ most significant betrayal to date was in United States v. [read post]
