Search for: "United States v. Rogers" Results 301 - 320 of 1,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am by Florian Mueller
Apple has very high shares in the smartphone, tablet, or smart watch markets in the United States, the geography the lawsuit focuses on, and does not allow other payment apps (particularly "wallet" apps) to use the iPhone's NFC chip. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
 The two other judges, gauging by their questions, expressed at least some agreement with Hentif or a measure of disagreement with the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:19 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
”ICYMI: An illustrated history of vaccine mandates in the United States (Chicago Tribune). [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Stanley Lemons and Lucas Mason-Brown, Decoding Roger Williams: The Lost Essay of Rhode Island’s Founding Father, (Baylor Univ. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:35 am by Kali Borkoski
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Bayer, in which Section 43(a) was read to provide a cause of action to a plaintiff whose pleaded trademark had never been used in the United States). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider a Pennsylvania woman’s argument that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to make her conduct – an effort to poison a romantic rival – criminal, even if the federal laws in which it did so were enacted to implement an international treaty prohibiting the use and proliferation of chemical weapons. [read post]