Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 61 - 80 of 1,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2023, 2:10 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
United States, discussed the Court’s interpretation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA), and identified open questions pertaining to the FSIA after the ruling. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am by Haley Proctor
* The Court also issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am by Haley Proctor
* The Court also issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Taney In 1826, Taney and Daniel Webster represented a client in a case that appeared before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
Matthew Guarnieri, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Art Museums in the United States While there are a few examples of public (e.g., Smithsonian museums) and for-profit (e.g., International Spy Museum) museums, the majority of museums in the United States—especially art museums—are nonprofit organizations with a 501(c)(3) status.[3] This means that most museums in this country are considered charities described under both § 501(c)(3) and § 170(c)(2), receiving most tax benefits among 29… [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:04 pm by Hyland Hunt
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services had denied a doctor’s application to adjust his status to a lawful permanent resident, finding him ineligible. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Otherwise, we have not yet had a truly uniform statute of limitations throughout the United States. [read post]
One interesting aspect about this case is the discussion of the “Rogers test” which was established in Rogers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]