Search for: "United States v. Rothenberg"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
Sarhan's sole remedy is to proceed by way of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, as per 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:18 am
It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Christian S. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
The site is owned by the federal government (government) and managed by the United States National Park Service (NPS). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
Rothenberg, Esq. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:36 am
That's the first mistake that has Judge Rothenberg upset. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:56 pm
See State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:33 am
Erhard Milch), and NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 1:51 am
COURT OF APPEALS,M SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Hobbs Act Requires Jury to Find Robbery of Drugs, Drug Proceeds, Affects Interstate Commerce United States, appellee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:41 am
See Weiss v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
United States, 293 F.2d 1013 (D.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:25 am
Lane v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
