Search for: "United States v. Russell" Results 41 - 60 of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-564 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to an amicus in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 1:14 pm by Douglas P. Matthews
On January 3, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Russell Moody v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-1367 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
Culliver (09-158), and invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Holy See v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Today Howe & Russell, in conjunction with our winter term Harvard Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, is filing this amicus brief on behalf of Constitutional Law Scholars in Al-Marri v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:01 pm
Yesterday, the First Circuit announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 5:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-1237 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:27 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
United States, and this Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: de Csepel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:24 pm by Matthew Landis
In a ruling issued yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that states can require internet merchants to collect sales tax, even if they do not have a physical presence in that state. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Nicastro - decided by the United States Supreme Court three months after Russell came down.  [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Kevin Johnson
United States, which raises the issue of the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:48 am
Today, Howe & Russell and the Stanford clinic are filing this reply brief  in Meacham v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
United States rejects the need for heightened scrutiny. [read post]