Search for: "United States v. SCRAP"
Results 41 - 60
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
By now most are likely aware of, or rapidly becoming aware of, the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has finally done the right thing and has scrapped the claims and continuations rules that have divided the patent community for the last 26 months. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:09 am
In the United States, for example, a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the plaintiff is (or will be) harmed by the law. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:06 am
He did not disclose the inventions to anyone in the United States before he applied for United States patents. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:34 am
The First Circuit offered yesterday the latest confirmation of the unstated rule in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:46 am
I’m the President of the United States of America. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:59 am
The terms of the bilateral agreement reached by the United States and Mexico on August 27, 2018, as per public statements released thus far, are summarized in Part V of Whither NAFTA? [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
Minerva Surgical, Inc. petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in September 2020 to consider the question “whether a defendant in a patent infringement action who assigned the patent, or is [next in line] with an assignor of the patent, may have a defense of invalidity heard on the merits. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:35 am
United States]. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
(The 1970s-era standing decision in question is United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
The trial in the case of Turley v Unite the Union concluded before Nicklin J on 19 November 2019. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
United States, No. 12-6142, involving the racist remarks of a federal prosecutor in Texas. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
The developing law of privacy will survive the scrapping of the HRA. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:42 pm
Reminds me of those catchy names plaintiff's groups often use (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
” The case is Kransky v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:01 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
” Yep, that leaves the Department of Justice, arguing on behalf of the United States of America, as one of the outliers. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:57 am
Scrap Material Co. v. [read post]
