Search for: "United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2019, 6:48 am
United States, 573 F. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
Washington Aluminum Co., the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Renee Schoof, McClatchy Newspapers, December 6, 2009 Negotiators in Copenhagen will try to nail down all the main elements of a treaty to curb global warming in the next two weeks, but a final agreement won’t be possible until the United States figures out what it will do to reduce emissions of heat-trapping pollution. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
– Occupational Health & Safety, February 14, 2010 The Environmental Protection Agency has settled with seven firms and individuals ac [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
