Search for: "United States v. San Francisco"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm
Weideman The United States Supreme Court has denied review of the Ninth Circuit decision upholding San Francisco’s employer mandated healthcare ordinance. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:34 pm
News coverage of today's hearing at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:34 pm
News coverage of today's hearing at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
” (Quoting San Francisco Beautiful v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
” (Quoting San Francisco Beautiful v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:59 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
The recent United States Supreme Court decision in Marshall v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:33 am
In 1898, the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark case that Wong Kim Ark, a child of Chinese parents who was himself born in San Francisco, was indeed an American citizen. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Francis Hotel in San Francisco. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:57 am
San Francisco [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:55 am
United States (10-5400), decided June 16, 2011. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:30 am
United States, and Yates v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
San Francisco Taxi Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:56 pm
McMurry A new Court of Appeal case, San Francisco Tomorrow v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:24 am
Department of Justice Who: EFF Senior Staff Attorney Adam Schwartz When: 10 am Thursday, May 19 Where: United States District Court 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, Courtroom B San Francisco, CA For more about Hemisphere and EFF’s FOIA lawsuit:https://www.eff.org/cases/hemisphere Contact: AdamSchwartzSenior Staff Attorneyadam@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:29 pm
Even if Plaintiffs’ public nudity at political rallies was entitled to First Amendment protection, however, we hold that the challenged ordinance is a valid, content-neutral regulation as applied to Plaintiffs’ expressive conduct under United States v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 12:20 am
In California-Nevada Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
In San Francisco Unified School District ex. rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
There are essentially four possible outcomes in the San Francisco marriage case (Perry v. [read post]
