Search for: "United States v. Sanders"
Results 1 - 20
of 476
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
And sometimes parody (Sanders says the choice in the U.S. is 'normal or crazy' in GOP response to Biden). . . . [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In contrast to the United States, a wide range of political parties offer up their presidential nominees in a single primary in which all voters cast their ballots. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:43 am
Here is the opinion: Dodge v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
It sits at the intersection of a number of concerning trends: rising political violence and violent rhetoric in the United States, particularly directed toward women, along with a right-wing media ecosystem that fuels that rhetoric and responds to violence by promoting further falsehoods. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Simply stated, Civil Investigative Demands used in False Claims Act investigations are essentially subpoenas authorized under 31 U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:11 am
United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Sanders 1964 case ushering the era of one-person, one-vote for U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:40 pm
United States 22-97Issue: Whether, if the United States causes a company to transfer private shareholders’ rights incident to their ownership of shares in the company to the United States for the public benefit, the private shareholders have a direct, personal interest in a cause of action challenging that taking. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:37 pm
Sanders (6th Cir. 2021), illustrates this principle well. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In 2013, in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 7:37 pm
Ring up one more United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm
Steve Sanders of Indiana University, a leading academic expert on same-sex marriage and the Full Faith and Credit Clause. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
(b) In this section, the term 'State' means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 12:52 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:49 pm
v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
