Search for: "United States v. Sanders" Results 261 - 280 of 500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
No other constitutional movement unites people as varied as Rand Paul and Bernard Sanders, Rush Limbaugh and Ralph Nader, Tea Party conservatives and the NAACP. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Texas the state can't criminalize homosexuality in general.Prison oversight bill in troubleStar-Telegram columnist Bob Ray Sanders says prison oversight legislation (HB 877) is probably dead.Prison YIMBYsSee a story out of Mineral Wells about local officials fighting to keep a private prison unit there open. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of the United States (recommending denial of certiorari) __________________ Docket: 07-539 Case name: Progress Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
Canon 3 (6) (A) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges prohibits judges from “public comment on the merits” of a pending or impending case. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
(b) In this section, the term 'State' means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
The moving defendant’s burden is to demonstrate that the act or acts of which the plaintiff complains were taken ‘in furtherance of the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue,’ as defined in the statute. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
The Court also filled out its March 3 argument calendar by re-setting some previously granted cases: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:12 pm by Emily Root
The Wine Group, Case No. 10-4202, the Court affirmed a preliminary injunction in favor of the distributors against the Wine Group (the third-largest wine manufacturer in the United States). [read post]