Search for: "United States v. Sanders" Results 301 - 320 of 498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am by Schachtman
  Late last month, however, a First Circuit panel of the United States Court of Appeals held that Rule 702 required perscrutation of expert witness opinion, and then proceeded to perscrutate perspicaciously, in Samaan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
Oliver Sanders of 1 Crown Office Row represented the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
 However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:49 am
There should however be a little notice somewhere to the effect that its contents are essentially United States-derived and United States-oriented. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:07 pm by Lawrence Higgins
[Link] Squire, Sanders & Dempsey is seeking an experienced patent agent. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am by Russell Beck
Well, on July 1, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, waded into the controversy. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm by Ken Kersch
Elizabeth Sanders (Government, Cornell), Magliocca (Law, Indiana-Indianapolis), and yours truly. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm by Zoe Tillman
Contreras “made strong and aggressive arguments for the United States, but he also was open to listening to counter arguments and to our side,” Robinson said. [read post]