Search for: "United States v. Sanders" Results 61 - 80 of 490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 3:57 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States, pointing out how the Court's recent opinion in Caniglia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:58 am by Fred Rocafort
For instance, tariffs on components for products made in the United States may be eliminated, as well as products made by the China operations of US companies. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Sanders when invalidating Georgia’s “county unit” system. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In the post-war South, white southern Democrats used felony disenfranchisement to deny those rights, invoking historical similarities between the legal statuses of slaves and convicts as justification.Today, according to a report by the Sentencing Project, nearly 40% of the 6.1 million people disenfranchised by a felony conviction are black.Despite the troubled association of felony disenfranchisement laws with racial discrimination, courts, like the 2002 Florida court, generally have upheld them in… [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:02 am by SHG
But there are about 2300 local prosecutors in the United States. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]