Search for: "United States v. Sanders" Results 81 - 100 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Strauss's main point was to reassure readers that it really didn’t matter all that much that Article V made the United States Constitution so notably difficult to amend. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
Sanders—the Court further cemented the “one person, one vote” doctrine. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
 But the real point of this posting is that we now seem to live in a world where it is only the President of the United States who is held unaccountable for behavior that increasingly draws scrutiny and discipline with regard to even high executives of other organizations. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:19 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Sanders, 41 M.J. 485, 486-87 (C.A.A.F. 1995); United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
After extradition to the U.S., they are convicted of, among other things, killing an officer or employee of the United States and using a firearm while committing a crime of violence. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders responded that the bill “confiscates every American’s private health insurance” and that “America will never be a socialist country. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:08 am by Steven Boutwell
A loophole in the drafting of last year’s legislation made its application (including the Commission’s service as the central collector for sales/use taxes on remote sales) contingent on the Supreme Court of the United States ruling the South Dakota sales tax law in Wayfair was constitutional. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Sandy Levinson
 As Schleicher notes, Vermont has a smaller population than 28 cities in the United States (including Austin, Texas, whose metropolitan area is approximately three times the population of Vermont) and 107 counties. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Kathleen Claussen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]