Search for: "United States v. Sanders" Results 121 - 140 of 496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Marty Lederman
Following up on the recent posts by Joey Fishkin and David Gans on the Evenwel case that the Court has decided to hear, I thought it might be worth posting the argument made by the United States the last time this issue reached the Court, in the government's brief in opposition to certiorari in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The United States solicitor general represents the federal government before the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rothschild turned to Jacobs for later disputes both in the United States and abroad, his complaint said. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 3:52 pm
In the judge's words, "Under these circumstances, the time has come for this court to rule without hearing from the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:42 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products: Advances in General Causation Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation,” PDF Joseph Sanders , “Milward v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]