Search for: "United States v. Santana" Results 41 - 60 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson
United States compels a finding that Section 16(b) is unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement, and Lynch v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:14 am by The Federalist Society
The Attorney General of the United States then obtained a grant of certiorari from the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by Mark Walsh
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
For Morales-Santana, who became a permanent resident of the United States in 1975, the issue arose when the federal government initiated proceedings to deport him from the United States after a series of criminal convictions that included robbery, burglary and attempted murder. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States; she highlights two cases before the court this term, Lynch v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:54 am by Cecere Santana, P.A.
More Blog Posts: State Supreme Court Rules for Defendant in Boating Accident Case, Cecere Santana Injury Lawyers Blog, published July 21, 2016. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:54 am by Cecere Santana, P.A.
More Blog Posts: State Supreme Court Rules for Defendant in Boating Accident Case, Cecere Santana Injury Lawyers Blog, published July 21, 2016. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
Weltover, a breaching party’s failure to make contractually required payments in the United States causes a “direct effect” in the United States triggering the commercial activity exception where the parties’ expectations and course of dealing have established the United States as the place of payment, or only where payment in the United States is unconditionally required by contract. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm by Thomas Hopson
Lohier served as a judge on the prominent antitrust case United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am by Sophia Cope
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in Glik v. [read post]