Search for: "United States v. Santana"
Results 81 - 100
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm
Based on the convictions, the immigration court and the Board of Immigration Appeals ordered Dimaya removed from the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:42 pm
Esquivel-Santana v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Santana v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:44 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
United States; she highlights two cases before the court this term, Lynch v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
Cruz Santana, No. 03 CV 6299(JG), 2005 WL 67094, at *8 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:20 pm
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this declaration in her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am
” A lawful immigrant from the Philippines, James Garcia Dimaya has lived in the United States since 1992. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
INS (2001), and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:14 am
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
Lohier served as a judge on the prominent antitrust case United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
S. ___, ___ (2017) (slip op., at 9) (quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:00 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s story before and after her appointment to the bench in 1993 is today an inspiration to many people in the United States and around the world. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
United States, 12-10638, is now most likely on hold for Robers; ditto Quince v. [read post]
