Search for: "United States v. Santana-Dones"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
However she did not know what exactly [he] had done to check up on her. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:54 am
Morales-Santana counters that declaring him a citizen is exactly what the court of appeals should have done. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am
In the bulk of cases in which immigration status is considered, it is done so after an assessment of the foregoing factors, and it is considered as only one element among many pointing either in favor of a finding of significant ties to the United States, or in finding a lack of significant ties to the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis failed to depart the United States as required by the visa. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
Weltover, a breaching party’s failure to make contractually required payments in the United States causes a “direct effect” in the United States triggering the commercial activity exception where the parties’ expectations and course of dealing have established the United States as the place of payment, or only where payment in the United States is unconditionally required by contract. [read post]
Exigent Circumstances: What They Are and How They Allow Police to Search and Seize Without a Warrant
15 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
App. 1991), citing to United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
(I noticed, when checking for additional facts, that George Washington Law Professor Orin Kerr has blogged on this subject, and he located federal cases with even closer factual situations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
(I noticed, when checking for additional facts, that George Washington Law Professor Orin Kerr has blogged on this subject, and he located federal cases with even closer factual situations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
