Search for: "United States v. Scheffer" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
In most states polygraph evidence is either per se inadmissible in trials or is only admissible by stipulation, see United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:12 pm
Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:08 pm
Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre Klaus Ferdinand Gärditz, “Treaty Override” Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawK.J. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:04 am
Scheffer, et al, v The Civil Service Employees Association, Local 828; Civil Service Employees Association; AFSCME, Local 1000, USCA, 2nd Circuit, Docket No. 07-3683-cv, Decided: June 28, 2010In considering an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York dismissing claims brought by public-sector employees who, as nonmembers of CSEA,* the union that represents them for collective-bargaining purposes, challenging… [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:11 pm
Supreme Court of Justice – Labor Chamber, Embassy of the Lebanese Republic in Colombia and Embassy of the United States of America in Colombia Eloïse Glucksmann, Commisimpex v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 5:31 pm
Crane, International humanitarian law in an age of extremes: unlawful uses of force by non-state actors Larissa van den Herik & Catherine Harwood, Commissions of inquiry and the Jus ad Bellum Douglas J. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:39 pm
Goldsmith and once in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by Kali Borkoski
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:09 am by Kent Scheidegger
" and so forth, and you may build a compelling case.Polygraph evidence is generally not admissible in court, although in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 12:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]