Search for: "United States v. Schlesinger" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 4:34 am by Jack Goldsmith
Chris Cillizza has a piece in the WP that argues that the world is too splintered and partisan and complex, and communication and persuasion too difficult, for the president of the United States to succeed. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:04 pm by Dwight Sullivan
I’ll link to the United States’ opposition to the TRO in a subsequent post. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:52 am
Schlesinger made the peculiar remark, to an audience which contained many foreign lawyers, that "making available" has been well established in United States copyright law for over 10 years. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:53 am by Wells Bennett
First, the district court correctly held that plaintiff’s claims are barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2241(e)(2), which bars jurisdiction over any non-habeas action “against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the . . . trial . . . of an alien who is . . . detained by the United States and has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant.” [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 1:55 pm
Judge Leonie Brinkema, of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm by Inside Privacy
By Benjamin Duke, Matt Schlesinger, and Scott Levitt [This article was also published as a Client Alert.] [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving threats made on social media. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]