Search for: "United States v. Schwimmer" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 9:41 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterMarty Schwimmer (via @trademarkblog) updates us on the latest, and floats a novel idea of his own for getting in on the action, in the ongoing legal war between the United States Polo Association and Ralph Lauren’s faux-Aryan-fashion empire.   [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Eugene Volokh
The “thought that we hate” phrase, by the way, comes from Justice Holmes’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the TTAB's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
But political turmoil in her home country soon prompted Schwimmer to seek refuge in the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known  mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:56 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
Enforceable contracts are so important to the economy, in fact, that the freedom to contract is included in both the New Jersey and United States Constitutions. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:56 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
Enforceable contracts are so important to the economy, in fact, that the freedom to contract is included in both the New Jersey and United States Constitutions. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am by Steve Baird
Not every day does the United States Supreme Court weigh in on a topic impacting the trademark world, but it did so yesterday in Already, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas 89-3 & 89-4, 902 F.2d 244, 249 (4th Cir. 1990) (quoting United States v. [read post]