Search for: "United States v. Schwimmer"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Schwimmer and John L. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929), aux pp. 654 et 655. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:26 am
TTABlogger comment: Marty Schwimmer and I wrote an article in 2019, entitled "US Law Inches Towards Protecting Trademark Reputation Without Use," in which we discussed some ramifications of the earlier Fourth Circuit decision deeming Bayer entitled to bring its Lanham Act claims despite never having used the FLANAX mark in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
Schwimmer and John L. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
—Holmes, United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
Lacteos de Honduras S.A. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
” First, in the 1929 case United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:56 am
Enforceable contracts are so important to the economy, in fact, that the freedom to contract is included in both the New Jersey and United States Constitutions. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:56 am
Enforceable contracts are so important to the economy, in fact, that the freedom to contract is included in both the New Jersey and United States Constitutions. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:24 am
Schwimmer, 279 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm
Its reliance on Vaudable [v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The “thought that we hate” phrase, by the way, comes from Justice Holmes’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
