Search for: "United States v. Schwimmer"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:14 am
Div. 2001); see also United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am
Not every day does the United States Supreme Court weigh in on a topic impacting the trademark world, but it did so yesterday in Already, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoenas 89-3 & 89-4, 902 F.2d 244, 249 (4th Cir. 1990) (quoting United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is a big question, taking into account the litigation of Cuban trade marks in the United States [Only accepted in TTAB proceedings: see "TTABlog Guest Comment: Marty Schwimmer on TTAB's "CUBITA" Summary Judgment Under The Pan American Convention"]. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
Schwimmer, 12 N.J. 293, 302, 96 A.2d 652, 656 (1953); Dontzin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
—Holmes, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
There also is the United States Coast Guard, which is controlled by the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
United States dissent, 1919 (His most eloquent defense of free speech) * The Gitlow v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644 (1929), aux pp. 654 et 655. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
” First, in the 1929 case United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
The United States Supreme Court has stated that by assuring confidentiality the privilege encourages clients to make `full and frank disclosures to their attorneys, who are then better able to provide candid advice and effective representation. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango) Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46) Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]