Search for: "United States v. Seaman" Results 81 - 100 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Cruise ship employees' employment contracts are "considered as commercial" under Title 9 of the United States Code. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Caldwell argued that the Benoit court’s finding that the vessel had been indefinitely moored was not the standard created the United States Supreme Court in Stewart v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:06 am
The Court does not refer to the prior United States Supreme Court decision in Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:31 am
Carnival removed the case to Federal court under the United Nations Convention for the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards arguing the seaman's claims were governed by the arbitration provision contained in his contract and that the claims must be arbitrated in Panama under Panamanian law. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Will Bland
Recently this doctrine became the focus of attention in an interesting case from the United States District Court in Hawaii.  [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 7:39 am by Robert J. Stefani
The Court stated: “Critically, the context in which work is done can affect whether it is seaman or non-seaman work. [read post]