Search for: "United States v. Seaman" Results 81 - 100 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2014, 5:15 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri agreed. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 7:39 am by Robert J. Stefani
The Court stated: “Critically, the context in which work is done can affect whether it is seaman or non-seaman work. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by Amy Howe
  The Court also invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in six cases: Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 9:35 am by Andy Clark
Earlier this year, the United States Supreme Court decided Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
Seaman, Assistant Professor of Law at Washington and Lee University School of Law. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 2:46 pm by Joseph A. Devall, Jr.
If you are a seaman, you better relax—according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, you have no claim under the Jones Act. [read post]
24 May 2014, 5:42 am by The JAG HUNTER
  Image link above ~~~~~~~~~~ Click on underlined “hot-links” Cemetery Watchmen Ashes found in trash led to proper burial LISTEN, REFLECT, and PRAY MANSIONS OF THE LORD – United States Military Academy Mens Glee Club THE NAVY HYMN – United States Naval Academy Mens Glee Club ECHO TAPS – United States Marine Corps Band ~~~~~~~~~~ Captain William Edward Nordeen, United States Navy (CLICK… [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:38 pm by James Beard
Most recently, this approach to light duty maintenance payments has been held to be correct by the United States District Court of Louisiana in Owens v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
On April 18, 2014, counsel for Jennifer Dize, the personal representative of the Estate of William Smith Dize, filed a interesting and very well-written petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:00 am by Jon Robinson
United States, 993 F.2d 211, 213 (11th Cir. 1993) (“[I]n order to recover damages under the Jones Act, [a plaintiff] must have the status of a seaman. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Jon Robinson
  Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:30 pm by Fred Goldsmith
United States, 584 F.2d 1151, 1155 (2d Cir. 1978), and 1B Benedict on Admiralty § 24 (2004) (recognizing that “an unseaworthy condition . . . on an otherwise fit vessel” can be created by “incompetent training or experience” or “unsafe method of work”). [read post]