Search for: "United States v. Searle" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2019, 1:00 pm by Oswin Ridderbusch
Although the Court dismissed the argument that sitagliptin should nevertheless be regarded as being “protected” by the basic patent because it embodies the “core inventive advance” of that patent, it did acknowledge that a corresponding approach is followed in the United Kingdom (and other EU member states), resulting in a divergent practice across the European Union. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
 * IP wrangling (briefly) delays Mourinho's anointment as new Manchester United managerWhat was the hold up with the Special One's latest deal? [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
Federal Circuit Distinguishes Enfish in New Patent Eligible Subject Matter DecisionThe patentability of computer-implemented inventions has been in doubt in the United States since the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Nicola Searle asks - who really owns these works? [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:05 am by Joy Waltemath
The nurse was also entitled to summary judgment on JHH’s direct threat defense, which the court found was based on post-hoc rationalizations and thus was suggestive of pretext (Searls v. [read post]