Search for: "United States v. Searle" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
Federal Circuit Distinguishes Enfish in New Patent Eligible Subject Matter DecisionThe patentability of computer-implemented inventions has been in doubt in the United States since the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:51 pm
United States, 384 F.2d 391, 404 (Ct. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant.  [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
 * IP wrangling (briefly) delays Mourinho's anointment as new Manchester United managerWhat was the hold up with the Special One's latest deal? [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:55 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog and Practice Center Contributor) Last week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Goeddel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States.” [read post]