Search for: "United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA INC et al – United States District Court – Middle District of Georgia – April 22nd, 2019) involves a products liability claim. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:47 am
Supp. 3d 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2014); Google, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
On Petitions for Review of a Final Rule of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:13 pm
Google, Inc., reversing the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York’s dismissal of Rescuecom’s complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a valid claim for relief. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
On 11 June 2015, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia handed down judgment in the controversial case of Equuestek Solutions v Google Inc (2015 BCCA 265) dismissing Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results (2014 BCSC 1063). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:33 pm
Honeywell Int’l Inc., No. 2012-1660 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
’” DePuy Spine, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Rather, today we will examine the recent decision handed down by United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Stephenson v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
In Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
The case is Hetronic International, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 pm
Xenotransplantation and Patent Law Biological patents are generally utility patents, which allow the patent holder to exclude others from making, selling, using, or importing their biological invention for a specified period of time, currently twenty years in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
The background Hetronic International Inc. makes, sells, and services radio remote controls for construction equipment, which have a distinctive trademark registered in the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
United States, 480 U.S. 522–526 (1987) (per curiam)); see also Henson v. [read post]
