Search for: "United States v. Shafer" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
Next Door Company, the Florida Supreme Court declared the statutory mandatory attorney fee schedule unconstitutional as a violation of due process under both the Florida and United States Constitutions. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Dennis Crouch
Such a contract conflicts with the public policy of the land, which is one that encourages inventions and discourages the exclusion of an employee from engaging in the gainful occupation for which he is particularly fitted for all time, anywhere in the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am by Norman L. Eisen
Shawn Still (1:23-cv-03792) (civil removal proceedings) Mar-a-Lago (MAL): United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
In January 2008, Staff Management fired Jimenez because she did not have authorization to legally work in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am by Michael B. Stack
  Read more…       Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments   On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am by INFORRM
It reported; “Unlike the United States, where many print reporters aspire to a measure of objectivity and media bias is seen as corrupting, many of Britain’s most-read papers take sides – and aren’t afraid to flaunt it. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
  Following appeal of the case by both parties, the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the lien activation fees on June 29, 2015. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2013), the Federal Circuit held the expert “assumed that (1) the sales revenue reported in the customers’ Form 10-K reflected sales of products with molded chokes; and (2) each third-party product shipped into the United States contained an infringing choke. [read post]