Search for: "United States v. Shafer"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am
Cir. 2013), the Federal Circuit held the expert “assumed that (1) the sales revenue reported in the customers’ Form 10-K reflected sales of products with molded chokes; and (2) each third-party product shipped into the United States contained an infringing choke. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Shawn Still (1:23-cv-03792) (civil removal proceedings) Mar-a-Lago (MAL): United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Georgia Special Purpose Grand Juries But Were Afraid to Ask
17 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
As a result, the law and practice of grand juries varies state-by-state. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
Section 1226(a) provides that “an alien may be arrested and detained pending a decision on whether the alien is to be removed from the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Nev. 2012) (citing United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:49 am
The Institutional Hearing Program: A Study of Prison-Based Immigration Courts in the United States by Ingrid V. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
Such a contract conflicts with the public policy of the land, which is one that encourages inventions and discourages the exclusion of an employee from engaging in the gainful occupation for which he is particularly fitted for all time, anywhere in the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
A substantial number of unauthorized immigrants sought asylum in the United States, claiming as a defense to removal under the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
Next Door Company, the Florida Supreme Court declared the statutory mandatory attorney fee schedule unconstitutional as a violation of due process under both the Florida and United States Constitutions. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
Following appeal of the case by both parties, the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the lien activation fees on June 29, 2015. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:21 am
However, her religious discrimination and hostile work environment claims failed because the dean’s stray comment about “veiled cars,” his irritation over her absences, and criticism by a guest at a party hosted by the dean were not enough to support even a prima facie case on either type of claim (Shafer v The American University in Cairo, July 30, 2014, Caproni, V). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
In January 2008, Staff Management fired Jimenez because she did not have authorization to legally work in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am
Read more… Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
