Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:06 am
Facts: This case (Shell Offshore Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 1:54 am
Daimler (as well as Sharp v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:38 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit handed down a ruling earlier this month in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:38 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit handed down a ruling earlier this month in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:10 pm
Brady v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:14 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
United States; see my preview), the question presented in the second case (United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
United States (OT 2009) Harjo v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
United States (OT 2009) Harjo v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 3:31 pm
Today, in Lopez-Soto v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm
As Thomas put it, it is “difficult to justify” subjecting the Lundgrens to yet another round of litigation over the tribe’s claim of “a sweeping and absolute immunity that no other sovereign has ever enjoyed—not a State, not a foreign nation, and not even the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Sharp issued a judgment ordering Circle C Construction, LLC to pay the United States a total of $762,894 for violation of the FCA. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm
This decision comes less than a month after a federal appeals court struck down the Board’s notice-posting rule that would have required employers to advise employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, and less than two years after the Supreme Court of the United States in New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm
This decision comes less than a month after a federal appeals court struck down the Board’s notice-posting rule that would have required employers to advise employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, and less than two years after the Supreme Court of the United States in New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
