Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 121 - 140 of 1,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
United States, Case No. 1:16-cv-00745-PLF, is pending in the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm by Greene LLP
Sharp issued a judgment ordering Circle C Construction, LLC to pay the United States a total of $762,894 for violation of the FCA. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm by Ronald Mann
As Thomas put it, it is “difficult to justify” subjecting the Lundgrens to yet another round of litigation over the tribe’s claim of “a sweeping and absolute immunity that no other sovereign has ever enjoyed—not a State, not a foreign nation, and not even the United States. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm by Epstein Becker Green
This decision comes less than a month after a federal appeals court struck down the Board’s notice-posting rule that would have required employers to advise employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, and less than two years after the Supreme Court of the United States in New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:35 am by admin
S. law in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm by Steve Vladeck
With those concerns in mind, Reinhard first unsuccessfully sought rehearing en banc (with the support of the United States as amicus curiae), before filing a petition for certiorari. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief summary of issues before the Court last week: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Sharp–(32 Cal. 2d 711)–Decided at the Supreme Court of California, this becomes the first case to find that anti-miscegenation laws in the United States were a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court denied automotive supplier Continental's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Avanci patent pool firm and several of its members (Nokia, Sharp, Conversant, Optis). [read post]