Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2021, 3:31 pm
Today, in Lopez-Soto v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
United States, Case No. 1:16-cv-00745-PLF, is pending in the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Sharp issued a judgment ordering Circle C Construction, LLC to pay the United States a total of $762,894 for violation of the FCA. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm
As Thomas put it, it is “difficult to justify” subjecting the Lundgrens to yet another round of litigation over the tribe’s claim of “a sweeping and absolute immunity that no other sovereign has ever enjoyed—not a State, not a foreign nation, and not even the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Sharpe, p. 1482, put it? [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm
This decision comes less than a month after a federal appeals court struck down the Board’s notice-posting rule that would have required employers to advise employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, and less than two years after the Supreme Court of the United States in New Process Steel LP v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:28 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:35 am
S. law in the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 4:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
United States, 2014 U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:29 am
28 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
United States, Nieves v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
The critical decision was, I think, Davis. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
With those concerns in mind, Reinhard first unsuccessfully sought rehearing en banc (with the support of the United States as amicus curiae), before filing a petition for certiorari. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
Under a line of cases beginning with United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Below is a brief summary of issues before the Court last week: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Sharp–(32 Cal. 2d 711)–Decided at the Supreme Court of California, this becomes the first case to find that anti-miscegenation laws in the United States were a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
