Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 141 - 160 of 1,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  The problem is that Citizens United was a sharp and unjustified break with prior precedent. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to bar within a matter of hours--ex parte, i.e., without a hearing--Avanci, Nokia, Sharp, Conversant (which has very recently become the third and latest Avanci member to sue Daimler for patent infringement, as I reported earlier today), and Optis from seeking another AAII against Continental in Germany.Today's TRO motion renews the original pursuit of a U.S. antisuit injunction against… [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 2:30 pm by David Lat
United States, which SCOTUS just agreed to hear. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Schmid, The Real Shariah Risk: Why the United States Cannot Afford to Miss the Islamic Finance Moment, (University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 3, 2013).Davi S. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
"The absence of an executive agreement between the United States and Mexico is central to our determination... [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm by Sheppard Mullin
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 12:24 pm by Tom Smith
Declaring this week that defending Ukraine against Russia’s invasion was not a vital interest for the United States, Gov. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm by Robert Thornton
  In sharp contrast to the above cases, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit invalidated the Service’s use of the “baseline” methodology. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am by Guest Blogger
 But because the Constitution gives Congress authority to govern non-state territories, the Supreme Court’s century-old decision in Grafton v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:35 am by Jeff Foust
In a sharp escalation of the ongoing debate over military launch contracts, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk announced Friday afternoon that the company was filing suit against the Air Force to formally protest a “block buy” contract the service made with United Launch Alliance. [read post]