Search for: "United States v. Shea" Results 1 - 20 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
From 2006 through 2018, plaintiffs honored the forbearance agreements while WOH “guided the project through . . . the APA permit, Town of Tupper Lake rezoning and subdivision approvals, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation permits, United States Army Corps of Engineers permits, and New York State Attorney General approvals” (Henry Aff., ¶ 5). [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 7:02 am by Simon Lester
Along the same lines, one could argue that veto powers have been used politically by developing countries leading to the failure of many negotiating rounds – by doing so, they paid no heed to any systematic concern for the WTO as a whole - so why should the United States’ exercise of veto be limited? [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:07 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
In this case, a Complaint was issued on January 13, 2006, by Kevin Shea, Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture to “Respondents, Daniel J. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
United States, a case which presents difficult issues regarding law enforcement access to cell site location information. [read post]