Search for: "United States v. Shea" Results 41 - 60 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:07 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
In this case, a Complaint was issued on January 13, 2006, by Kevin Shea, Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture to “Respondents, Daniel J. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
United States, a case which presents difficult issues regarding law enforcement access to cell site location information. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am by Ben
In August 2016, she placed the photograph—which has a pending copyright registration in the United States—on her Instagram page, accompanied by a copyright notice. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]