Search for: "United States v. Shipley" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
The lawyers argue that even when false marking doesn't cause any "proprietary injury," it still has a negative effect on the United States, "which suffers injury to its sovereignty arising from violation of its laws. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:35 am by John Day
  Surprisingly, the United States Supreme Court has never directly addressed the issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:53 am by Jeffrey Kahn
Shipley wrote you a letter that said your travel is "not in the interests of the United States," you stayed put. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 5:37 pm by Wells Bennett
Department of Homeland Security, by Judge William Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:44 pm
This time, the appeals court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, ruled for the prosecution. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm by Robert Chesney
  In a 2012 opinion by Judge William Fletcher, plaintiff’s substantial connections to the United States were held sufficient to entitle her to proceed with her constitutional challenge even though she is not a U.S. citizen or resident in the United States (the opinion may be found at 669 F.3d 983). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:14 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeSupervised Release Violator Barred From Seeking Reconsideration or Habeas Relief From Sentence United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by Janet Lindenmuth
The case was eventually appealed to the United States Supreme Court which found in Burton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am by David Oscar Markus
  Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]