Search for: "United States v. Silk" Results 81 - 100 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Rulings The following has been published: Silk v Telegraph.co.uk – Complaint under clause 1 (accuracy), resolution statement. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Digital Silk Road: China and the Rise of Digital Repression in the Indo-Pacific. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Federal preemption of state tort claims BIC Pen Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
Because I am not working for the Chinese government, alleged to be cyber-hacking into Britain's secrets and those of the United States, I have absolutely no idea whether Russia plans to invade or bomb Britain, or do other nefarious activities in our air space, by flying their Tupolev bombers, capable of carrying nuclear weapons, near to European, British and United States airspace. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
  China, the United States, and Russia are left to squander muscle as they will, always subject to the legitimating judgment of this superego. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor)   Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm by Erin F. Fonté and Ferdose al-Taie
Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) studied use of cryptocurrencies in illegal activities (such as the now infamous “Silk Road” website). [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am by Josh Blackman
And this limiting principle would avoid almost the entire parade of horribles that Colorado and the United States warned about. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm by Orin Kerr
I gather one consequence of my proposed approach would be that the Court would likely need to overturn United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 2:04 pm by Guest Author
  The recent decision by Judge Amit Mehta in United States et al. v. [read post]