Search for: "United States v. Silk"
Results 81 - 100
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:45 am
To prevent China’s influence in the world’s Internet infrastructure, the United States and its allies have heavily resisted Chinese undersea cable projects. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Spanish Patents and Trademark Office (SPTO) archives (Class 46) Spains 350 Super Brands revealed (Class 46) Taiwan French luxury goods producer Hermes won a record US $7.5 million in damages in a trade mark infringement case brought against a former employee who had sold four counterfeit handbags (IPKat) (Reuters) United Kingdom UK copyright tribunal modernisation (Excess Copyright), (IPKat) The Patents, Trade Marks and Designs (Address for… [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
Rulings The following has been published: Silk v Telegraph.co.uk – Complaint under clause 1 (accuracy), resolution statement. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
(STL discussion here); Pet Silk, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
The Digital Silk Road: China and the Rise of Digital Repression in the Indo-Pacific. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Federal preemption of state tort claims BIC Pen Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
Because I am not working for the Chinese government, alleged to be cyber-hacking into Britain's secrets and those of the United States, I have absolutely no idea whether Russia plans to invade or bomb Britain, or do other nefarious activities in our air space, by flying their Tupolev bombers, capable of carrying nuclear weapons, near to European, British and United States airspace. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
See Witkoff v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
China, the United States, and Russia are left to squander muscle as they will, always subject to the legitimating judgment of this superego. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) studied use of cryptocurrencies in illegal activities (such as the now infamous “Silk Road” website). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
And this limiting principle would avoid almost the entire parade of horribles that Colorado and the United States warned about. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court in Burwell v. [read post]
