Search for: "United States v. Simon" Results 21 - 40 of 670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
The Supreme Court recently reviewed Matal, Interim Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:10 pm by Ruthann Robson
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:25 pm
Roberts engaged in a rare series of questions reflecting controlled frustration and disbelief at arguments from one of his former law clerks—representing the United States—that the State department did not have enough information to say what the court should do in the case Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:55 am by Mali Friedman
By Mali Friedman and Simon Frankel With all eyes on the Affordable Care Act today, the United States Supreme Court also quietly dismissed a case that could have had a profound impact on a wide range of citizens’ rights litigation—First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:33 am by Steven Cohen
Simon Property Group Inc – United States District Court – Northern District of Indiana – South Bend Division – October 19th, 2016) involves two shopping plazas. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:38 am by Sean Hayes
The United States is a contracting state to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“Foreign Arbitral Awards Convention”). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:58 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
This past week, the Sixth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the United States District Court in the case of Sun Life Assurance Co. v. [read post]