Search for: "United States v. Sims" Results 61 - 80 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-646, Tyler v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
On January 12, 2018, the Supreme Court decided to take up one of these cases, Lucia v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am by NCC Staff
 “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” read the amendment’s first section. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:58 pm by Mike Mireles
In contrast, Judge Gorsuch, in a concurring opinion in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]