Search for: "United States v. Sims"
Results 81 - 100
of 266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
Sims, 2009 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am
In United Federation of Churches v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
Sims, the Court expanded the scope of the principle of population equality to state legislative districts. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
In Oppenheimer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:51 pm
Sims) were argued on the same day (October 9, Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s first day on the Supreme Court bench) as another ACCA case, Stokeling v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm
Sims, which dealt with district lines, became a focal argument. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am
On January 12, 2018, the Supreme Court decided to take up one of these cases, Lucia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
In the meantime, the United States SupremeCourt took up the lethal injection issue in Baze v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:54 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 5/5/10Cite: Peckham v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Two days later, [he] flew back to the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
United States, No. 05-5713 "Denial of petition for habeas relief, alleging that court-appointed counsel failed to timely petition for certiorari review is vacated and remanded where, construing the appeal as motion to recall the mandate, the motion is granted, the judgment vacated, and the matter is remanded in accordance with Wilkins v. [read post]
