Search for: "United States v. Sims" Results 101 - 120 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 2:58 pm by Mike Mireles
In contrast, Judge Gorsuch, in a concurring opinion in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am by Susan Brenner
Constitution states that `The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-646, Tyler v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/05/02/10-10079.pdf United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Sims, a landmark United States Supreme Court election law precedent which -- according to the Republican leaders -- holds that courts should be reluctant to toss redistricting challenges because of the possibility of disrupting imminent elections. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]