Search for: "United States v. Sims"
Results 141 - 160
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Sims v Dacorum Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 12This was an appeal by Mr Sims from a first instance possession order. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:36 pm
Although there are many things notable about this lawsuit (including the decision by Zynga not to bring a CFAA claim following the recent 9th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
State, 688 So.2d 01, 306 (Fla. 1996); Sims v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:23 pm
Apple is the sole defendant in the lawsuit; neither AT&T Mobility, nor any related business units at the telecom was named a party. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am
Constitution states that `The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 4:03 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:30 pm
To effect this goal, they've poured millions of dollars into The Sims Social,[7] and in August 2011 they proudly released the Facebook version of this 150 million unit selling franchise. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
Sims, “[t]o the extent that a citizen’s right to vote is debased, he is that much less a citizen. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm
Sims, a landmark United States Supreme Court election law precedent which -- according to the Republican leaders -- holds that courts should be reluctant to toss redistricting challenges because of the possibility of disrupting imminent elections. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
The lower court had held that while there was lack of probable cause for that search warrant, they could invoke the good faith doctrine established by United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:46 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:03 pm
State, 370 Ark. 31, 257 S.W.3d 50 (2007) (holding that it was permissible for a police officer to ask for consent to search the vehicle when the officer had determined that he would issue a warning ticket but had not yet returned the driver’s identification papers or issued that ticket); see also Sims v. [read post]
