Search for: "United States v. Sims"
Results 161 - 180
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2012, 4:03 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:30 pm
To effect this goal, they've poured millions of dollars into The Sims Social,[7] and in August 2011 they proudly released the Facebook version of this 150 million unit selling franchise. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
Sims, “[t]o the extent that a citizen’s right to vote is debased, he is that much less a citizen. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm
Sims, a landmark United States Supreme Court election law precedent which -- according to the Republican leaders -- holds that courts should be reluctant to toss redistricting challenges because of the possibility of disrupting imminent elections. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
The lower court had held that while there was lack of probable cause for that search warrant, they could invoke the good faith doctrine established by United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:46 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:03 pm
State, 370 Ark. 31, 257 S.W.3d 50 (2007) (holding that it was permissible for a police officer to ask for consent to search the vehicle when the officer had determined that he would issue a warning ticket but had not yet returned the driver’s identification papers or issued that ticket); see also Sims v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:55 pm
The first case, Kelly Sims v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:36 pm
Additionally, in developing this proposed regulation, the CDCR was guided by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Baze v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Sims, 442 U.S. 415, 423, 99 S.Ct. 2371, 60 L.Ed.2d 994 (1979). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Sims, 442 U.S. 415, 423, 99 S.Ct. 2371, 60 L.Ed.2d 994 (1979). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
"And even if the Supreme Court is fixated on Citizens United, a united citizenry might decide to focus on the actual words of the Constitution themselves.The Guarantee Clause says that the United States shall guarantee to the states a republican form of government. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:04 am
" KIVITV reports that: United States v. [read post]
