Search for: "United States v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2025, 1:47 pm
United States, 23-1281Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:27 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935); Banks v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:13 am
” The UK government stated that it “won’t be following the same path” as the Americans, “unless or until, at some point in the future there is a threat that we are concerned about in the British interest. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
United States, Shah v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:49 am
United States rejecting the use of obstruction of legal proceedings against January 6th defendants will potentially impact hundreds of cases.... [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
United States; and (b) it justifies the conduct of the Special Counsel under Department of Justice policies, rebutting Trump's baseless allegations that the prosecution was politically motivated.Appended to the report is an Addendum consisting of a 12-page letter from Todd Blanche, Trump's lawyer and nominee to be Deputy Attorney General, and a 2-page reply thereto from Smith. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:11 am
Section 2383 permits a finding for liability if one "engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 7:30 am
United States rejecting the use of obstruction of legal proceedings against January 6th defendants will potentially impact hundreds of cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 6:58 am
” Smith v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:15 am
Smith v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
United States, Smith could not rely on much of his complaint due to violating constitutionally protected areas. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:09 am
United States The Supreme Court heard submissions last week on the proposed law that would ban TikTok in the US over national security concerns unless its China-based parent company sells the platform by 19 January 2025. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 8:36 am
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:37 am
NATO took over air defenses in Poland from the United States yesterday, the alliance’s spokesperson said, adding that the move is part of a broader effort to shift the responsibility for helping Ukraine to European countries. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 11:10 am
In this memo, Defendant announced that there still were no records responsive to one set of Plaintiff's requests (communications with former Special Counsel Jack Smith) but that there were in fact records responsive to Plaintiff's second set of requests (communications with the United States House January 6th Committee)—but those were exempt from disclosure. [read post]
