Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 201 - 220 of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 2:27 pm by Paul Levy
District Judge Virginia Kendall, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, decided that Forte was protected from suit by 47 U.S.C. § 230 and that re-labeling its defamation claims as trademark claims (or right of publicity claims, or misappropriation claims) was not enough to evade section 230.  [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 7:19 pm
Smith on SSRN, titled Sexual Abuse of Women in United States Prisons: A Modern Corollary of Slavery. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
The United States, Defendant  (Opinion and Order, United States Court of Federal Claims, No. 11-779C, June 15, 2015). we were presented with the following Plaintiffs:Plaintiff Starr International Company, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:31 am
Earlier this month the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by Gene Quinn
On November 13, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requested the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:54 pm
Ortiz United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules), with introductory note by Kasey McCall-Smith United Nations Security Council Resolution 2298, with introductory note by David P. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Further proof that the death of Crawford has been greatly exaggerated comes in the form of a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States Postal Service 17-1594 Issues: (1) Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; and (2) whether an action under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:47 pm by Orin Kerr
Now consider the Fifth Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:45 am by JB
Perhaps now, having received assurances from the President of the United States that he actually possesses the powers of judicial review, Judge Smith can at last breathe a well-deserved sigh of relief. [read post]