Search for: "United States v. Smith"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:40 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:28 pm
The bottom line:The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered summary judgment that De- fendants-Appellants Northgate Technologies, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc., and Linvatec Corp. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(Ibid., citing United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
JonesIn United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
I've added a statement on the case from The Owners' Rights Initiative, about the Supreme Court ruling that even books purchased outside the United States are subject to the 'First Sale Doctrine' as long as they are legally purchased (piracy is still a no-no), and brought into the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
High Court Accra, ex parte Attorney General Alexia Solomou, Smith v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:31 am
The case is Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm
Epps goes on to explain that the very same decision that established judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 1:17 pm
Mansfield & Helen V. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
The U.S. government sought certiorari to challenge the remand, and after its decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 7:26 am
Smith & Wesson Corp., et al., 2021 WL 423741 (6th Cir. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 9:29 pm
App. 30, 42-43, 683 S.E.2d 316, 322-23 (2009); see also United States v. [read post]