Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 541 - 560 of 4,626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 5:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Smith (University of Idaho College of Law) has posted Idaho's Law of Constitutional Interpretation: Lessons from Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
An Acoba spokesperson explained “the Ministerial Code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 1:00 pm by Josh Blackman
"] On June 5, a Fifth Circuit panel (Smith, Higginson, and Willett) heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
While a few regulatory decisions are still outstanding, the Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard merger review process now comes down to the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
While StoneRidge decreased the use of class action litigation against auditors in the United States, more foreign countries are permitting class action suits against auditors as a way to enhance shareholder protection. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:19 am by Jeff Welty
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), the Supreme Court considered a case where one prosecutor failed to disclose to the defense that another prosecutor had made a promise of leniency to a key witness in exchange for the witness’s testimony. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hall stated that respondent should have disclosed the SIG Sauer handgun on his 2020 employee personal information form, filed with petitioner on April 22, 2020, and he should have disclosed the Smith and Wesson rifle on the 2019 and 2020 forms (Tr. 69, 71-72). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hall stated that respondent should have disclosed the SIG Sauer handgun on his 2020 employee personal information form, filed with petitioner on April 22, 2020, and he should have disclosed the Smith and Wesson rifle on the 2019 and 2020 forms (Tr. 69, 71-72). [read post]