Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 3,609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Jennifer Brand
The “Leaders in Law” monthly webinar series will feature interviews with notable attorneys who are advancing civil rights in the United States and across the world. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Holmes
The Leaders in Law monthly webinar series will feature interviews with notable attorneys who are advancing civil rights in the United States and across the world. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:19 pm by WP Admin
”      For those more familiar with the practices of the Supreme Court of the United States, that language probably does not strike you as odd. [read post]
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
On June 5, the United States filed a motion seeking an order to seal the criminal complaint for thirty days. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
 The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]