Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 5,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Smith v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:03 am by John Stigi
The Court’s decision in Chadbourne would appear to limit SLUSA to cases where plaintiffs allegedly purchased, sold or held (see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:16 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in Alvarez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2006, 10:09 am
United States that Antarctica is not a foreign country and therefore income earned there is fully taxable. and at the same time that in 1993 the Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
  That legal challenge went all the way to the United States Supreme Court (the highest court in our country), which ruled in favor of Anna Nicole Smith in 2006. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court has consolidated the cases and limited the questions to question one and two in the United States government’s memorandum of July 22 in both Smith & Nephew, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 1152-such that the federal government may prosecute Indians for virtually any state-law offense committed in Indian country, including on lands promised by treaty for the “exclusive use” of Indian tribes.Lower court materials here. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm by Zarine Kharazian
United States, Supreme Court Edges Fourth Amendment Doctrine into the 21st Century appeared first on IELR Blog. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm by Zarine Kharazian
United States, Supreme Court Edges Fourth Amendment Doctrine into the 21st Century appeared first on IELR Blog. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 In his majority opinion, Judge Smith wrote that the Administrative Procedure Act does not "require[] the Secretary to remove any alien or to alter his enforcement priorities," and he quoted with approval "the Supreme Court’s description, in [Reno v. [read post]